Ko’pchilik o’rganuvchilar insho yozishni boshlashga shunchalik ishtiyoqmand bo’lishadiki, ularni savolni juda tez o’qishadi. Savolni juda tez o’qiganliklari tufayli, introductionda uni noto’g’ri paraphrase qilishadi. So’ngra body paragraphs ni yozish paytida esa savoldan yanayam uzoqlashib ketaverishadi. ❌
Bundan ham yomoni, ko’plab o’rganuvchilar faqat savoldagi umumiy mavzuni topishadiyu, yozishni boshlab yuborishadi. Natijada esa, savolda so’ralgan asosiy masala umuman inshoda yoritilmaydi.
Nima qilish kerak?
Savolni shoshmasdan o’qing. IELTSda hech qachon sizdan umumiy mavzuni muhokama qilish so’ralmaydi. Shuning uchun asosiy muhokama mavzusini aniqlamaguningizga qadar savolni o’qing. ☝️
Masalan, quyidagi savolga e’tibor bering:
In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Ko’pchilik bu savolni shoshib o’qishganida, bu savol fast food va uning oqibatida kelib chiqadigan semizlik haqida deb o’ylaydi va inshosini shu haqida yozadi. Afsuski, bu noto’g’ri. 🙅♂🙅♀
Savolni sinchiklab o’qisangiz, unda sizdan fast foodga soliqni hukumat tomonidan oshirish kerakmi yo’qmishu narsa so’ralyapti. Inshoyingiz soliqni oshirishga bo’lgan munosabatingizni qamrab olishi kerak. Agarda siz fast foodning zararlari yoki semizlikning oqibatlari haqida yozsangiz, bu OFF-TOPIC hisoblanadi.
Ko’pchilik o’rganuvchilar insho yozishni boshlashga shunchalik ishtiyoqmand bo’lishadiki, ularni savolni juda tez o’qishadi. Savolni juda tez o’qiganliklari tufayli, introductionda uni noto’g’ri paraphrase qilishadi. So’ngra body paragraphs ni yozish paytida esa savoldan yanayam uzoqlashib ketaverishadi. ❌
Bundan ham yomoni, ko’plab o’rganuvchilar faqat savoldagi umumiy mavzuni topishadiyu, yozishni boshlab yuborishadi. Natijada esa, savolda so’ralgan asosiy masala umuman inshoda yoritilmaydi.
Nima qilish kerak?
Savolni shoshmasdan o’qing. IELTSda hech qachon sizdan umumiy mavzuni muhokama qilish so’ralmaydi. Shuning uchun asosiy muhokama mavzusini aniqlamaguningizga qadar savolni o’qing. ☝️
Masalan, quyidagi savolga e’tibor bering:
In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Ko’pchilik bu savolni shoshib o’qishganida, bu savol fast food va uning oqibatida kelib chiqadigan semizlik haqida deb o’ylaydi va inshosini shu haqida yozadi. Afsuski, bu noto’g’ri. 🙅♂🙅♀
Savolni sinchiklab o’qisangiz, unda sizdan fast foodga soliqni hukumat tomonidan oshirish kerakmi yo’qmishu narsa so’ralyapti. Inshoyingiz soliqni oshirishga bo’lgan munosabatingizni qamrab olishi kerak. Agarda siz fast foodning zararlari yoki semizlikning oqibatlari haqida yozsangiz, bu OFF-TOPIC hisoblanadi.
“To the extent it is used I fear it’s often for illicit finance. It’s an extremely inefficient way of conducting transactions, and the amount of energy that’s consumed in processing those transactions is staggering,” the former Fed chairwoman said. Yellen’s comments have been cited as a reason for bitcoin’s recent losses. However, Yellen’s assessment of bitcoin as a inefficient medium of exchange is an important point and one that has already been raised in the past by bitcoin bulls. Using a volatile asset in exchange for goods and services makes little sense if the asset can tumble 10% in a day, or surge 80% over the course of a two months as bitcoin has done in 2021, critics argue. To put a finer point on it, over the past 12 months bitcoin has registered 8 corrections, defined as a decline from a recent peak of at least 10% but not more than 20%, and two bear markets, which are defined as falls of 20% or more, according to Dow Jones Market Data.
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
